Does Michelle Rowland support AI safety policies?

Position unclear. While Michelle Rowland hasn't stated their position, Labor has an unclear stance on AI safety policies.

Michelle Rowland (Labor) represents Greenway in the House of Representatives.

In public statements she has acknowledged AI as requiring regulatory attention and noted government work on AI reforms, while emphasising the need for safeguards against emerging technological harms including AI-generated content.

Current Positions

Attorney-General

Since 2025

Legal frameworks for AI regulation, privacy law, and intellectual property rights affecting AI development

Key Statements on AI Safety

“In fact, it is incumbent on those of us who seek to unlock the benefits of AI to confront these issues squarely so that Australians have confidence in AI, and confidence in our justice system using AI.”

Australian Law Forum Speech · View source →

1 of 8

Loading quotes...

Contact Attorney-General Rowland

Official contact page →

Their score on expert-recommended AI safety policies

Over 357 experts, public figures, and concerned citizens endorsed these policies in their open letter before the 2025 election.

AI Safety Institute

A well-resourced, independent technical body to assess AI risks and advise on safety standards.

Learn more about this policy

Michelle Rowland unclear position (from party policy)

Party Notes: Labor claims that the Department of Industry, working with the National AI Centre (NAIC), is Australia's AI Safety Institute. This contrasts with international AISIs, which are typically new, independent, technically-focused bodies. The NAIC’s mandate is AI adoption, not frontier safety. Key indicators of a functional AISI such as dedicated technical staff, specific funding, evaluation capabilities (e.g., model testing, compute resources) appear absent and unplanned. This makes Labor's position ambiguous regarding genuine support for a well-resourced safety institute.

Show details

Mandatory Guardrails

A dedicated AI Act with mandatory guardrails for high-risk AI systems will both protect Australians and create the certainty businesses need to innovate.

Learn more about this policy

◐

Michelle Rowland partially supports (from party policy)

Party Notes: Labor says it's focused on legislative options around mandatory guardrails for high-risk AI, harmonised with international best practices. Labor said on 15 April, “We will have more to say about next steps soon.” While this suggests an Australian AI Act is a possibility, it leaves the door open to letting existing regulators handle AI on a piecemeal basis.

Show details

How do the politicians score on AI safety?

Search to see where parties and candidates stand on key AI policy issues

Loading search...