Australians for AI Safety
Ways to ActContact PoliticiansContact Media
Open LettersElection Scorecard
Expert-recommended PoliciesAI Safety InstituteAI Act
EventsMediaFAQs

Note: This scorecard was created for the 2025 federal election and may no longer be up to date.

Does Fusion support AI safety policies?

Somewhat. Fusion supports some of the expert-recommended AI safety policies.

Contact Information

Phone: +61490134827

Website: https://www.fusionparty.org.au

Visit official contact page

Contact Address

254 McLeod Lane, MANSFIELD, VIC 3722

Australians for AI Safety

Stay updated

By subscribing, you accept our Terms and Privacy Policy. Unsubscribe at any time.

Good Ancestors

Australians for AI Safety is organised by Good Ancestors (ABN 23 664 195 484), a charity registered with the Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission.

NOTE: By signing our open letters, individuals and organisations endorse only the core text. Footnotes and additional content are prepared by Good Ancestors and may not represent the views of all signatories.

© 2025 Good Ancestors. All rights reserved.

Website content that is electoral matter under the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 is authorised by Greg Sadler, Good Ancestors Policy, Melbourne.

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceContact UsFAQ

Their score on expert-recommended AI safety policies

Over 357 experts, public figures, and concerned citizens endorsed these policies in their open letter before the 2025 election.

AI Safety Institute

A well-resourced, independent technical body to assess AI risks and advise on safety standards.

Learn more about this policy
✓

FUSION | Planet Rescue | Whistleblower Protection | Innovation supports

Mandatory Guardrails

A dedicated AI Act with mandatory guardrails for high-risk AI systems will both protect Australians and create the certainty businesses need to innovate.

Learn more about this policy
◐

FUSION | Planet Rescue | Whistleblower Protection | Innovation partially supports

Notes: They said: "The proposed guardrail regulations are broadly reasonable, insofar as they can be applied. However, we do not think this is the sole approach that should be relied upon for the more serious risks which have high potential to arise outside these regulatory frameworks. The safety-critical management approach has proven application to contexts which are in many ways more similar to some risks from AI."