Australians are concerned about generative AI
Almost unanimous concern about generative AI
Public opinion data on AI governance, regulation, and safety measures
We've collected key polling statistics showing how Australians feel about AI safety and regulation. The data comes from various research organisations and surveys, giving us a snapshot of public opinion on AI governance and risk management.
Use the search and filters below to find specific topics or browse by source. Each statistic links back to the original research where you can read more about the methodology and findings.
Almost unanimous concern about generative AI
Including 58% who want standards stricter than airlines. Only 6% would accept looser rules. Aviation carries a risk of less than 1 in 10 million deaths per flight.
Strong majority support for Australian leadership in global AI governance initiatives
Existing laws largely innefectual for biggest risks
The right to challenge an AI decision and have the complaint reviewed by a person.
A body to assess advanced AI, brief government on its risks, and work with industry on deploying it safely.
Requiring large AI developers to undergo annual independent audits of their safety compliance.
Requiring AI developers to report safety incidents such as model escapes, unauthorised access, or autonomous behaviour to authorities within 72 hours.
Preventing situations where AI systems could get out of human control ranked among the top risks Australians want government to address.
Requiring AI models to have shutdown capabilities so developers can disable a model in an emergency.
Clear support for establishing dedicated AI regulatory oversight
A regulator that sets and enforces laws and safety standards for AI.
A further 79% want more coverage of how AI is going to affect society.
Making developers of large AI models liable for catastrophic harms caused by their models.
Only 13% think regulation is keeping pace with AI development, and just 5% think it is running ahead.
Strong trust dividing from building international standards
Asked whether a delay would be worthwhile if it reduced catastrophic risk from 5% to 0.5%. Even a 50-year delay drew majority support (57%).
Majority view AI existential risk as critical global challenge requiring urgent action
Only 2% trust technology companies "a great deal" to ensure the AI they develop is safe. Australia is among the least trusting countries surveyed.
When forced to choose, only 26% are more concerned that the government will go too far regulating AI.
When forced to choose between managing risks from AI and driving innovation from AI, 72% chose risk management.
21% are very worried and 42% fairly worried that AI will lead to widespread unemployment.
19% are very worried and 39% fairly worried that humans will lose control of AI.
Majority support for a global ban on developing artificial superintelligence, a stated goal of several frontier AI companies.
Asked about an AI system with a 1% chance of causing over 1 million deaths but a 60% chance of solving climate change and extending lifespan by 20 years, 51% found the trade-off unacceptable. Even at a 1 in 10,000 chance, 46% rejected it.