Mandatory reporting of serious AI incidents

Where it stands

Nothing here yet.

Risks this could address

• AI security vulnerabilitiesAI security vulnerabilities fits this recommendation. 0 people said so.AI security vulnerabilities does not fit this recommendation. 0 people said so.
• AI governance failureAI governance failure fits this recommendation. 0 people said so.AI governance failure does not fit this recommendation. 0 people said so.
• Dangerous AI capabilitiesDangerous AI capabilities fits this recommendation. 0 people said so.Dangerous AI capabilities does not fit this recommendation. 0 people said so.
• + Add a riskSuggest another risk for this recommendation

Who is calling for this

• Global Shield Australia

  Star this source to save it for later — kept in this browser, not sent anywhereSomething wrong with this source?

  Guardrails & Gap Analyses: An assessment of Australia's approach to AI regulation (Aug 2026), Recommendation 2 Read it ↗

  “The Government should establish a mandatory monitoring and reporting mechanism for serious AI incidents, harms, and near misses, to give agencies the visibility needed to prioritise reforms.”

• UNSW AI Institute

  Star this source to save it for later — kept in this browser, not sent anywhereSomething wrong with this source?

  Submission 19 to the Joint Select Committee on Artificial Intelligence (2026), Recommendation 5 Read it ↗

  “Require incident reporting, independent evaluation, red-teaming and supply-chain and foreign-interference assessment for AI used in critical settings.”

• Uniting Church in Australia (Synod of Victoria and Tasmania) and U Ethical

  Star this source to save it for later — kept in this browser, not sent anywhereSomething wrong with this source?

  Submission 81 to the Joint Select Committee on Artificial Intelligence (2026), Recommendations Read it ↗

  “Require mandatory reporting of significant AI-related harms and voluntary reporting for users negatively affected by AI.”

• Sovereign Acumen

  Star this source to save it for later — kept in this browser, not sent anywhereSomething wrong with this source?

  Submission 114 to the Joint Select Committee on Artificial Intelligence (2026), Recommendation 2 Read it ↗

  “Establish mandatory independent evaluation and serious-incident reporting for designated frontier AI systems available in Australia.”

• PauseAI Australia

  Star this source to save it for later — kept in this browser, not sent anywhereSomething wrong with this source?

  Submission 126 to the Joint Select Committee on Artificial Intelligence (2026), Recommendation 5 Read it ↗

  “That AI developers and operators of large-scale AI compute in Australia be required to report to a Commonwealth regulator their installed compute, frontier training, and safety incidents”

• AGW Legal & Advisory

  Star this source to save it for later — kept in this browser, not sent anywhereSomething wrong with this source?

  Submission 201 to the Joint Select Committee on Artificial Intelligence (2026), 6.1 Statutory AI Safety Obligations Read it ↗

  “Mandatory obligations for developers and deployers of high‑risk AI systems, including: • safety testing • red‑teaming • incident reporting”

• Global Shield Australia

  Star this source to save it for later — kept in this browser, not sent anywhereSomething wrong with this source?

  Submission 256 to the Joint Select Committee on Artificial Intelligence (2026), Recommendation 4 Read it ↗

  “The Committee should consider and make recommendations on Australia’s ability to regulate frontier AI developers, how best to address model-level risk, and options for Australia to contribute to international rules and norms on AI.”

• Good Ancestors Policy

  Star this source to save it for later — kept in this browser, not sent anywhereSomething wrong with this source?

  Submission 257 to the Joint Select Committee on Artificial Intelligence (2026), Recommendation 6 Read it ↗

  “Create incident reporting obligations that require developers to report critical safety incidents to the Australian Government.”

• Gradient Institute

  Star this source to save it for later — kept in this browser, not sent anywhereSomething wrong with this source?

  Submission 259 to the Joint Select Committee on Artificial Intelligence (2026), Recommendation 2 Read it ↗

  “2. Introduce mandatory AI incident reporting, with the AI Safety Institute as the receiving body”

• Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU)

  Star this source to save it for later — kept in this browser, not sent anywhereSomething wrong with this source?

  Submission 282 to the Joint Select Committee on Artificial Intelligence (2026) Read it ↗

  “A licensing regime would mandate ongoing transparency over AI products and models available in Australia, including regular auditing of their safety, the development of guardrails against high- risk use, effective governance, and mandatory reporting of major incidents.”

• Anthropic

  Star this source to save it for later — kept in this browser, not sent anywhereSomething wrong with this source?

  Submission 305 to the Joint Select Committee on Artificial Intelligence (2026) Read it ↗

  “We support requirements (explored within the Office of AI’s consultation paper on the proposed Australian Standards for AI13) on developers of the most capable models to publish a safety framework, report on catastrophic-risk evaluations at regular intervals and notify the Government of critical safety incidents”

Write to your representative about AI safety