Work with other middle powers on AI

Where it stands

Nothing here yet.

Risks this could address

• Power centralisationPower centralisation fits this recommendation. 0 people said so.Power centralisation does not fit this recommendation. 0 people said so.
• AI race dynamicsAI race dynamics fits this recommendation. 0 people said so.AI race dynamics does not fit this recommendation. 0 people said so.
• AI governance failureAI governance failure fits this recommendation. 0 people said so.AI governance failure does not fit this recommendation. 0 people said so.
• + Add a riskSuggest another risk for this recommendation

Who is calling for this

• Good Ancestors Policy

  Star this source to save it for later — kept in this browser, not sent anywhereSomething wrong with this source?

  Australia's position in the Age of AI (2026), Position 6 Read it ↗

  “Middle powers have a lot to lose from AI, and a lot to gain by working together. Australia has a record of building coalitions and should use our influence and expertise to safeguard the interests of Australia, our allies, and like-minded nations through partnership with our peers.”

• Global Shield Australia

  Star this source to save it for later — kept in this browser, not sent anywhereSomething wrong with this source?

  Submission 256 to the Joint Select Committee on Artificial Intelligence (2026), Ask 5 Read it ↗

  “It should also work with neighbours in the Pacific and Southeast Asia, and partners further abroad, to build governance capacity, shared norms, and a common voice on key AI issues.”

• Social Cyber Institute

  Star this source to save it for later — kept in this browser, not sent anywhereSomething wrong with this source?

  Submission 165 to the Joint Select Committee on Artificial Intelligence (2026) Read it ↗

  “A key further step for Australia should be to look to lead international partnerships. This can include Five Eyes members but also other like-minded countries.”

Write to your representative about AI safety